{"id":6214,"date":"2013-04-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-04-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/2013\/04\/29\/first-freedom-the-fight-for-religious-liberty\/"},"modified":"2013-04-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-04-29T00:00:00","slug":"first-freedom-the-fight-for-religious-liberty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/2013\/04\/29\/first-freedom-the-fight-for-religious-liberty\/","title":{"rendered":"First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=&quot;line-height: 1.45em;&quot;>On December 18, 2012, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) presented a 90-minute documentary titled <\/span><em style=&quot;line-height: 1.45em;&quot;>First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty<\/em><span style=&quot;line-height: 1.45em;&quot;><br \/>\n\t. An excellent introduction to this all-important subject, it traced the development of religious freedom in America from early colonial times to shortly<br \/>\n\tafter 1800, coming down firmly on the side of church-state separation. It used a great many period visuals and featured short interviews with many<br \/>\n\treligious liberty scholars. George Washington, John and Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, and others come off well, though<br \/>\n\tJohn Winthrop and the Puritans come off as, well, narrow and unfriendly to religious freedom and diversity. A DVD of the program is available.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty,<\/em><br \/>\n\tby eminent historian Randall Balmer, is the companion book to the television program. A handsome, lavishly illustrated 9\u201d x 12\u201d coffee-table volume, it is<br \/>\n\tsuitable for either the general reader or as a supplemental reading for high school or college history classes. It is comfortably priced at $26.99. An<br \/>\n\tEpiscopal priest, author Randall Balmer has had a distinguished career as a professor of religious history at Columbia and Dartmouth, and has also been a<br \/>\nvisiting professor at Princeton, Yale, Northwestern, and Emory universities. He is the author of more than a dozen books, including<em>God in the White House: How Faith Shaped the Presidency From John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush<\/em>. His second book,\t<em>Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory: A Journey Into the Evangelical Subculture in America<\/em>, was made into a three-part award-winning PBS documentary.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tBalmer touches all the bases\u2014the Puritans of New England, the Anglican south, the more diverse middle colonies\/states; the development of the Declaration<br \/>\n\tof Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights; Roger Williams, Anne Hutchinson, and Mary Dyer; the Virginia struggles that led to adoption of<br \/>\n\tthe church-state separation principle; Madison\u2019s Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, Washington\u2019s 1790 letter to the Jewish<br \/>\n\tcongregation in Newport, Rhode Island (actor Ed Asner and I were featured speakers at the 1990 bicentennial celebration at the Touro Synagogue there), and<br \/>\n\tJefferson\u2019s famous 1802 \u201cwall of separation\u201d letter to the Danbury Baptists, the influence of religious dissenters, and the deism of founders such as<br \/>\n\tJefferson and Franklin.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAlthough the book is wonderfully comprehensive, there are items that I wish had been included. He could have included mention of the 1797 treaty with<br \/>\n\tTripoli, negotiated under Washington, ratified by the Senate, and signed ostentatiously by John Adams, which stated that \u201cthe government of the United<br \/>\n\tStates of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.\u201d Sadly missed, too, is Benjamin Franklin\u2019s earlier dictum: \u201cWhen a religion is<br \/>\n\tgood, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and God does not take care to support it so that its professors [adherents]<br \/>\n\tare obliged to call for the help of the civil power [government], \u2019tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIn the book\u2019s prologue Balmer shows that the men who gathered in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 to draft the Constitution were well aware of the<br \/>\n\thistory of church-state relations, or entanglements, from the establishment of Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire in the fourth<br \/>\n\tcentury, through the Middle Ages, the Reformation, and wars of religion in Europe, to the settlement of our New World after 1607 by Puritans in the north,<br \/>\n\tAnglicans in the south, and a mixing bowl in the colonies in between.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tPuritan New England was as close to a theocracy as you could get. Church and state were united. Almost as a direct result of this, Anne Hutchinson and her<br \/>\n\tfamily were forced out of Massachusetts for her heterodoxy. Quakers were executed on Boston Common. Roger Williams was so uncomfortable with Puritan<br \/>\n\ttheocracy that he founded Rhode Island as a haven for dissenters and became the first great champion of religious liberty, ultimately inspiring Thomas<br \/>\n\tJefferson. (I was thrilled when I was the speaker years ago at the Roger Williams Baptist Church in Providence, and I wish <em>First Freedom<\/em> had<br \/>\n\tincluded photos of the statues of Anne Hutchinson and Quaker martyr Mary Dyer\u2014very visible on the lawn of the Massachusetts state capitol in Boston.)\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAs our country moved in the direction of independence during the eighteenth century, religious diversity grew by leaps and bounds. Methodists, Baptists,<br \/>\n\tPresbyterians, Quakers, Lutherans, Dutch Reformed, Unitarians, Moravians, Schwenkfelders, Catholics, Jews, and unorganized deists competed with the<br \/>\n\testablished Congregationalists in the north and Anglicans in the south. \u201cDissenting\u201d Baptist preacher Isaac Backus in Massachusetts preached a sermon in<br \/>\n\t1773 titled \u201cAn Appeal to the Public for Religious Liberty, Against the Oppressions of the Present Day\u201d calling for separation of church and state, while<br \/>\n\tin Virginia Baptist preachers were thrown into jail.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tA year after the American Revolution began in the spring of 1775, a committee of five, including Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin, got together to draft the<br \/>\n\tDeclaration of Independence. Aware of our religious diversity, they attributed our inalienable rights to a generic \u201cCreator\u201d\u2014nicely counterpoising the<br \/>\n\t\u201cdivine\u201d rights of the people against the European tradition of \u201cdivine right of kings.\u201d With the war for independence over and our first constitution, the<br \/>\n\tArticles of Confederation, proving unworkable, the representatives of the people met in Philadelphia in 1787 to draft what was to be the Constitution of<br \/>\n\tthe United States of America.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe original constitution was virtually silent on the matter of religion, no mention of a Creator but only a brief prohibition in Article VI of religious<br \/>\n\ttests for public office and a statement that all federal and state legislative, executive, and judicial officers \u201cshall be bound by oath or affirmation.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tEarly in the war, in 1776, Virginia adopted a Declaration of Rights that asserted that \u201creligion . . . can be directed only by reason and conviction, not<br \/>\n\tby force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience.\u201d Freedom,<br \/>\n\tMadison declared at the time, is superior to toleration. But there remained a way to go. Still to be dealt with was the question of government compelling<br \/>\n\tcitizens to contribute to the support of an established church or even to support all churches. Jefferson put it this way: \u201cTo compel a man to furnish<br \/>\n\tcontributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical,\u201d and, \u201ceven the forcing him to support<br \/>\n\tthis or that teacher of his own religious persuasion, is depriving him of the comfortable liberty of giving his contributions to the particular pastor<br \/>\n\twhose morals he would make his pattern.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tDuring the war, popular Virginia politician Patrick Henry favored establishing the Anglican (Episcopal) Church, something Jefferson, Madison, and the<br \/>\n\tdissenting churches opposed. As matters came to a head in 1785, Madison wrote his brilliant Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments to<br \/>\n\tcounter Henry. It worked, and in 1786 Virginia adopted Jefferson\u2019s landmark Statute for Religious Freedom, one of his three accomplishments that he wanted<br \/>\n\tto be remembered for.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe new Constitution still had to be ratified by the states. Jefferson, our envoy to France, and Madison were disappointed that the document lacked a bill<br \/>\n\tof rights. Ratification then was contingent on the promise that a bill of rights would be added as soon as possible. After several revisions Congress<br \/>\n\tarrived at what is now the First Amendment: \u201cCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.\u201d<br \/>\n\tDespite the wishes of Madison and others, the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government. Making it applicable to state and local government had<br \/>\n\tto wait until passage of the Fourteenth Amendment after the Civil War and then for decades more, until the Supreme Court got around to confirming the fact.<br \/>\n\tThe several states included similar provisions in their constitutions.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tBeyond the scope of <em>First Freedom<\/em> and the PBS documentary are the current and ongoing often bitter battles over religious freedom, tax support for<br \/>\n\treligious institutions, and freedom of conscience in Congress, in state legislatures, in the media, in academia, and elsewhere. But the American experience<br \/>\n\twith religious liberty stands as a beacon to the whole world. And Randall Balmer\u2019s great book and the PBS documentary are outstanding contributions in the<br \/>\n\tnever-ending struggle for freedom.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On December 18, 2012, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) presented a 90-minute documentary titled First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty . An excellent introduction to this all-important subject, it traced the development of religious freedom in America from early colonial times to shortly after 1800, coming down firmly on the side of church-state separation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[293],"tags":[125],"class_list":["post-6214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-may-june-2013","tag-may-june-2013"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6214","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}