{"id":6317,"date":"2015-07-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-07-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/2015\/07\/01\/liberty-sentinels-and-monuments-to-freedom\/"},"modified":"2015-07-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2015-07-01T00:00:00","slug":"liberty-sentinels-and-monuments-to-freedom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/2015\/07\/01\/liberty-sentinels-and-monuments-to-freedom\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberty Sentinels and Monuments To Freedom"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\tThe other day, as I passed by the nicely framed pictures of the ten <em>Liberty<\/em> editors from 1906 to the present, an inner voice suddenly brought me up with a<br \/>\n\tsimple, yet profound thought. There really should be eleven! Yes, what about Alonzo T. Jones?\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tA few days earlier I had themed my <em>Liberty <\/em>welcome to the attendees at our 13th annual Religious Liberty Dinner on the simple passage of time. \u201cIt is hard<br \/>\n\tto believe,\u201d I told them, \u201dthat it is nearly 500 years since the Reformation that invigorated the concept of religious freedom.\u201d Then, without pause, I hit<br \/>\n\tanother significant marker: \u201cHard to believe that it is nearly 300 years since the Great Awakening that gave a religious liberty imperative to the<br \/>\n\tsoon-to-emerge United States.\u201d And then the payoff for<em> Liberty <\/em>awareness: \u201cHard to believe that it is nearly 110 years since the first issue of Liberty<br \/>\n\tmagazine, begun in the aftermath of misbegotten efforts to advance religious practice by legislation.\u201d\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tBut that very mention of \u201cmisbegotten efforts\u201d should have itself invoked an explanation of A.T. Jones. &nbsp;In 1888 a Senator Blair introduced what he<br \/>\n\tintended to be a national Sunday law. It had the support of many mainline religious groups and such politically influential groups as the then widespread<br \/>\n\tWomen\u2019s Christian Temperance Union. &nbsp;A quick online survey lists national Sunday laws as a recurring conspiracy theory. I wish it were so. The proposal of<br \/>\n\t1888 was real enough, and it rode in on the same sort of religious empowerment that shoots at the courthouse and Constitution on a regular basis even<br \/>\n\ttoday.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tHere is the meat of the bill, reprinted at the time by Jones in his magazine, just to give a sense of what it entailed:\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201c50th CONGRESS, } S. 2983. 1st SESSION. }\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cIN the Senate of the United States, May 21, 1888, Mr. Blair introduced the following bill, which was read twice, and referred to the Committee on<br \/>\n\tEducation and Labor: &#8212;\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cA bill to secure to the people the enjoyment of the first day of the week, commonly known as the Lord\u2019s day, as a day of rest, and to promote its<br \/>\n\tobservance as a day of religious worship.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That no person, or corporation, or the<br \/>\n\tagent, servant, or employee of any person or corporation, shall perform or authorize to be performed any secular work, labor, or business to the<br \/>\n\tdisturbance of others, works of necessity, mercy, and humanity excepted; nor shall any person engage in any play, game, or amusement, or recreation, to the<br \/>\n\tdisturbance of others, on the first day of the week, commonly known as the Lord\u2019s day, or during any part thereof, in any territory, district, vessel, or<br \/>\n\tplace subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States; nor shall it be lawful for any person or corporation to receive pay for labor or service<br \/>\n\tperformed or rendered in violation of this section.\u201d\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tJones, in his testimony before the Senate Committee on Education and Labor, gave a considerable verbal rebuttal and an even more complete case in the<br \/>\n\tmaterial he gave for the record. As a Seventh-day Adventist, I particularly like the following; which is most pertinent: \u201cIf this bill were framed in<br \/>\n\tbehalf of the real Sabbath of the Lord, the seventh day, the day which we observe; if this bill proposed to promote its observance, or to compel men to do<br \/>\n\tno work upon that day we would oppose it just as strongly as we oppose it now, and I would stand here at this table and argue precisely as I am arguing<br \/>\n\tagainst this, and upon the same principle, &#8212; the principle established by Jesus Christ, &#8212; that with that which is God\u2019s the civil government never can of<br \/>\n\tright have anything to do. That duty rests solely between man and God; and if any man does not render it to God, he is responsible only to God, and not to<br \/>\n\tany man, nor to any assembly or organization of men, for his failure or refusal to render it to God; and any power that undertakes to punish that man for<br \/>\n\this failure or refusal to render to God what is God\u2019s, puts itself in the place of God. Any government which attempts it, sets itself against the word of<br \/>\n\tChrist, and is therefore antichristian.\u201d\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe bill failed, I think in no small part due to the efforts of Alonzo T. Jones&mdash;and, of course, the many other civil libertarians who saw not only<br \/>\n\ttheological overreach but unconstitutionality.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThat was in 1888; about 127 years ago and before<em> Liberty<\/em> began publication. But maybe that figure is not quite so distant for the magazine as it appears.<br \/>\n\tJones was actually the first religious liberty leader of the newly formed Seventh-day Adventist Church and the editor from 1887 to 1899 of its first<br \/>\n\treligious liberty journal, the American Sentinel or the <em>Sentinel of Liberty<\/em>, as it was later known. And that is the giveaway to the <em>Liberty<\/em> connection. In<br \/>\n\tactuality the magazine has existed since then, with the gap of just a handful of years before it reappeared under its present shortened name.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tSo I am determined to put a rather large framed photograph of Alonzo T. Jones at the head of we Johnny-come-lately editors. He spent twelve years setting<br \/>\n\tthe model for a magazine of note, which continues to provide a vehicle for a religious liberty proclamation which is for all, and which threads separation<br \/>\n\tof church and state, the Constitution, the Bible, church history, civil history, legal analysis, rational philosophical argument and the rights of man into<br \/>\n\tan unbreakable argument.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tGod bless you and Thank You, Alonzo T. Jones: an old soldier who should never be allowed to fade away!\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAnd in thanking one hero of liberty, I am compelled to mention another, more recent, friend of Liberty.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAt that same Liberty Dinner at the elegant Willard Hotel in Washington D.C., I presented a plaque of recognition to an associate who is stepping back a<br \/>\n\tlittle after decades of service.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tDr. John Graz (who has an article in this very issue) is a man who has risen higher in my estimation with each passing year. He has the look of a diplomat<br \/>\n\tand the style to match; and the Swiss and French origins to prove it. He has a Sorbonne doctorate that he wears not on his sleeve but in his mental acuity;<br \/>\n\twhich for me made the hours of discussion we had about history and philosophy during many airport layovers rich and treasured times.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tFrom 1995 on he has been the Secretary General of the International Religious Liberty Association; from 2002 he carried the elected position of Secretary<br \/>\n\tof the Christian World Communions, and from 1999, when I began editing <em>Liberty&nbsp;<\/em>Magazine, a friend and colleague.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tJohn and I travelled together to quite a few out of the way places. I think of some harrowing times together in Ambon, Indonesia, immediately after<br \/>\n\treligious violence there, as we passed through ruined towns and deserted villages and visited churches with bullet holes in the walls. I think of visiting<br \/>\n\tnewly independent East Timor and together discussing religious liberty with its President and various religious leaders, and the Fretelin faction which had<br \/>\n\tprecipitated civil war. I think of the meal we had that was designed to test Western taste buds to the limit: a meal that consisted of nothing else but a<br \/>\n\tlarge mound of Durian; the love-hate stinky fruit of Asia (the only time I saw John waver). But the most memorable moment and most typical of his recent<br \/>\n\ttravels was John in the Dominican Republic, on the stage in a stadium jammed with about 10,000 mostly young people, yelling out \u201cThank You God, thank you<br \/>\n\tto this country, for religious liberty.\u201d He has done that dozens of times in recent years, before ever bigger audiences of ever more enthusiastic crowds.<br \/>\n\tIt is a wonderful counterpoint to the increasing horrors of religious violence and persecution. It was John\u2019s best answer to the call to battle on behalf<br \/>\n\tof religious freedom. It\u2019s been a pleasure serving with you, John.\n\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The other day, as I passed by the nicely framed pictures of the ten Liberty editors from 1906 to the present, an inner voice suddenly brought me up with a simple, yet profound thought. There really should be eleven! Yes, what about Alonzo T. Jones? A few days earlier I had themed my Liberty welcome<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[307],"tags":[139],"class_list":["post-6317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-july-august-2015","tag-july-august-2015"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6317"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6317\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}