{"id":6343,"date":"2016-03-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2016-03-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/2016\/03\/01\/sound-the-alarm\/"},"modified":"2016-03-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2016-03-01T00:00:00","slug":"sound-the-alarm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/2016\/03\/01\/sound-the-alarm\/","title":{"rendered":"Sound the Alarm"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\tWhen Maria Goldstein ordered 500 copies of a flyer at Office Depot online on August 20, 2015, she was in for a big surprise. The flyer was meant to be<br \/>\n\thanded out in conjunction with a weeklong prayer and fasting campaign at her church aimed at educating people and changing opinions about abortion. It<br \/>\n\tcontained statistics about abortion in the U.S. in general and the nonprofit organization Planned Parenthood in particular, as well as \u201cA Prayer for the<br \/>\n\tConversion of Planned Parenthood,\u201d written by Fr. Frank Pavone, the national director of Priests for Life and a prominent pro-life leader. She intended to<br \/>\n\tpick her order up at the Schaumburg, Illinois, Office Depot, which was close to her home, but she received a phone message from a store employee saying<br \/>\n\tthat he needed to discuss the order with her.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tUpon calling the store, she was informed that her flyer couldn\u2019t be printed, because it violated corporate policy, though no one could tell her precisely<br \/>\n\twhat that policy was or how her flyer violated it. She was invited to use the self-serve copiers to print the flyer herself. This solution wasn\u2019t<br \/>\n\tconvenient, and although she was able to have her flyer printed through a different venue, Goldstein felt discriminated against.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cIn the beginning stages,\u201d says Goldstein, \u201cI was really confused. I couldn\u2019t believe that they\u2019d be discriminating against me based on my religion. I just<br \/>\n\tcouldn\u2019t believe it. And I certainly believed that when I contacted someone at Office Depot, they were going to make it right. I thought they\u2019d see there<br \/>\n\twas nothing wrong with the flyer, and they\u2019d offer to print it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tRepeated attempts to reach officials at the store, however, were unsuccessful until she contacted the Thomas More Society, a national public interest law<br \/>\n\tfirm that provides pro bono legal services in cases that support life, family, and religious liberty. They advised her to make one more attempt, notifying<br \/>\n\tOffice Depot that she had retained legal counsel. Not surprisingly, she received a return call the next morning and was told that if material made an<br \/>\n\temployee feel uncomfortable, they didn\u2019t have to print it. She was also informed that the store was working on a policy to address similar situations.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cThat\u2019s what I was told,\u201d says Goldstein, \u201cbut in the media, Office Depot said the flyer constituted hate speech and implied persecution against employees<br \/>\n\tof Planned Parenthood, which was not at all what they told me.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cI was very upset when they came out with the terms \u2018hate speech\u2019 and \u2018persecution\u2019 because it\u2019s so much against what I do. I\u2019m a sidewalk counselor at an<br \/>\n\tabortion clinic. Every week I go out there, and I counsel women. I offer them help. I have cried with women. I\u2019ve given out information; I\u2019ve given out my<br \/>\n\tphone number so they can contact me, and they have.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cI\u2019m not against them. I\u2019m not against anybody who\u2019s involved in the abortion business. What I seek and what the prayer [on the flyer] was seeking was<br \/>\n\tenlightenment, and to call it hate speech and persecution was so off base it was really insulting.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWithout assistance from the Thomas More Society, that\u2019s likely how Goldstein\u2019s situation would have ended. Instead, her lawyer, Thomas Olp, wrote to Office<br \/>\n\tDepot president Roland Smith, stating that refusal to print Goldstein\u2019s flyer violated public accommodation laws as detailed in the Cook County Human<br \/>\n\tRights Ordinance and the Illinois Human Rights Act, which exist to prevent precisely this type of religious discrimination. In fact, all states have<br \/>\n\tversions of public accommodation laws, though they do not all protect the same rights. (For a full list by state, see sidebar.)<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIn Cook County, where the Office Depot that Goldstein attempted to use is located, the Cook County board of commissioners enacted the Cook County Human<br \/>\n\tRights Ordinance to prevent \u201cprejudice, intolerance, bigotry, and discrimination occasioned thereby [which] threaten the rights and proper privileges of<br \/>\n\tthe county\u2019s inhabitants and menace the institutions and foundation of a free and democratic society.\u201d <sup>1<\/sup> Their ordinance protects the rights of<br \/>\n\tpeople such as Maria Goldstein who request services from businesses in the county through public accommodation protections. \u201cPublic accommodation\u201d is<br \/>\n\tdefined by the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance as a \u201cperson, place, business establishment, or agency that sells, leases, provides, or offers any<br \/>\n\tproduct, facility, or service to the general public in Cook County, regardless of ownership or operation (1) by a public body or agency; (2) for or without<br \/>\n\tregard to profit; or (3) for a fee or not for a fee.\u201d<sup>2<\/sup><sup><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cThe public accommodation law requires that you give full service,\u201d says Olp, \u2018full\u2019 meaning that the same service you would give to anybody else, you\u2019ve<br \/>\n\tgot to give to this person, too. You\u2019re offering full service to the public; you\u2019ve got to give it to everybody without unlawful discrimination, which is<br \/>\n\tdefined to mean discrimination because of race, religion, etc.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOffice Depot\u2019s response to Olp\u2019s letter came via their assistant general counsel, Robert Amicone, who defended Office Depot\u2019s right to refuse service based<br \/>\n\ton the fact that Fr. Pavone\u2019s prayer could have been a potential copyright violation (grounds for refusal of service because of copyright infringement<br \/>\n\tlaws) and that the flyer contained graphic language calling abortion clinics \u201cdeath camps in our midst\u201d and referring to the \u201ckilling of children in the<br \/>\n\twomb\u201d and \u201cthe grisly trade in baby body parts.\u201d He characterized the reference to the \u201cevil\u201d of the abortion industry as hate speech and wrote that<br \/>\n\tbecause of its graphic content and hate language, the flyer would have violated Office Depot\u2019s policy regardless of its religious expression.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tHowever, Olp said Office Depot backtracked from their initial response very quickly. It\u2019s possible that had something to do with the story going viral in<br \/>\n\tthe media. Amicone\u2019s letter arrived on September 11, 2015, a Friday morning, and by early afternoon they had reversed their position. In a letter of the<br \/>\n\tsame date, Elisa Garcia, executive vice president and chief legal officer, wrote, \u201cUpon reflection, we believe that reasonable minds may differ on whether<br \/>\n\tthe flyer is a violation of the policy, and in that case, we should have found a way to fulfill Ms. Goldstein\u2019s order.\u201d<sup>3<\/sup> The letter concluded<br \/>\n\twith an apology to Goldstein and an invitation to allow them to fulfill her order, which she did.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cWe\u2019re very happy that Office Depot changed its mind,\u201d says Olp, \u201cand did it so quickly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tYou could call it a simple misunderstanding; that\u2019s clearly how Office Depot chose to see it, in the end&mdash;officially, at least. You could call it religious<br \/>\n\tdiscrimination; that\u2019s how it felt to Maria Goldstein. But whatever you choose to call it, however you choose to view it, you should consider it an early<br \/>\n\twarning sign of an infringement of religious liberty and sound the alarm. James Madison, in his \u201cMemorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments,\u201d<br \/>\n\twrote that it is \u201cproper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. We hold this prudent jealousy to be the first duty of citizens, and one of<br \/>\n\tthe noblest characteristics of the late Revolution. The free men of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and<br \/>\n\tentangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle. We revere<br \/>\n\tthis lesson too much soon to forget it.\u201d<sup>4<\/sup> In a country in which it is becoming increasingly harder to speak what you believe without offending<br \/>\n\tsomeone or being accused of \u201chate speech,\u201d in which politically correct phrases are de rigueur, in which standing up for what you believe in is becoming<br \/>\n\ttrickier and trickier, it becomes increasingly necessary to take preventative action, as Maria Goldstein did, before precedents are set. You cannot hold<br \/>\n\tthe line if you do not first take a stand.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cIt\u2019s the height of political correctness,\u201d says Olp, \u201cto say, \u2018If you don\u2019t tolerate anything that\u2019s legal out there, you\u2019re involved in hate speech;<br \/>\n\tyou\u2019re doing something wrong. And if it\u2019s religiously motivated we don\u2019t care. We just think it\u2019s wrong. We\u2019re going to ignore any religious aspect of what<br \/>\n\tyou\u2019re doing. Because, after all, religion should be kept in your church. Go into your church and worship, but when you come out into the public square, no<br \/>\n\treligion, please.\u2019 That seems to be the secular mentality. And more and more it\u2019s being pushed into the laws.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tYou would think that America, being a country comprised primarily of immigrants, a great many of which were fleeing religious oppression, would itself be<br \/>\n\tmore passionate about religious freedom and less judgmental. Yet this has never been so. There has been discrimination based on religion since its birth.<br \/>\n\t\u201cIn newly independent America, there was a crazy quilt of state laws regarding religion. In Massachusetts, only Christians were allowed to hold public<br \/>\n\toffice, and Catholics were allowed to do so only after renouncing papal authority. In 1777, New York State\u2019s constitution banned Catholics from public<br \/>\n\toffice (and would do so until 1806). In Maryland, Catholics had full civil rights, but Jews did not. Delaware required an oath affirming belief in the<br \/>\n\tTrinity. Several states, including Massachusetts and South Carolina, had official, state-supported churches.\u201d<sup>5<\/sup> There has, of course, been<br \/>\n\tdiscrimination based on race, which prompted an entire civil war, and discrimination based on country of origin: Germany and Japan during World War II, and<br \/>\n\tmore recently, anyone whose ethnicity originates in Muslim-majority countries. While anti-Semitism appears to be waning in America, it continues to be a<br \/>\n\tpersistent problem.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tDiscrimination has always had a grip on America, and not all types of discrimination are unlawful. But in the area of public accommodation, according to<br \/>\n\tthe Civil Rights Act of 1964, the most comprehensive civil rights legislation in the history of the United States, it <em>is<\/em> unlawful to discriminate<br \/>\n\tagainst someone based on race, color, religion, or national origin in any place of public accommodation. If we do not make a stand for religious freedom in<br \/>\n\tthe public square, no one will make it for us.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\u201cLet\u2019s red-circle an area for religious expression, religious liberty,\u201d says Olp, \u201cand not allow it to be closed down further and further by secular<br \/>\n\tbelievers forcing people to essentially keep their mouths shut and not do what Christians need to do, which is to evangelize. Every time you stand up for<br \/>\n\treligious liberty, it\u2019s a good thing. It helps people appreciate first, that there is religious liberty, and second, that it needs to be protected by<br \/>\n\tpeople who have backbone and are willing to stand up for it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWhile Goldstein is worried that the wording of the apology from Office Depot seems to leave the door open for future problems, she feels blessed that God<br \/>\n\twas able to use the situation. \u201cI set out to pass out 500 flyers to my fellow parishioners, and through this situation, God has allowed me to reach<br \/>\n\tthousands of people with the message of truth that the pro-life movement is one of love and peace and hope. That\u2019s what we\u2019re about, and it\u2019s not hate, and<br \/>\n\tit\u2019s not persecutory.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tGoldstein says she\u2019s learned to trust in what God wants to do, and not back down. \u201cWhen we\u2019re being discriminated against, which seems like it\u2019s happening<br \/>\n\tmore and more, we can\u2019t back down. We\u2019ve got to stand up for our religious liberty and for our God, quite honestly.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When Maria Goldstein ordered 500 copies of a flyer at Office Depot online on August 20, 2015, she was in for a big surprise. The flyer was meant to be handed out in conjunction with a weeklong prayer and fasting campaign at her church aimed at educating people and changing opinions about abortion. It contained<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[311],"tags":[143],"class_list":["post-6343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-march-april-2016","tag-march-april-2016"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6343\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.charming-bohr.160-238-31-172.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}